Skip to main content
Search Interpretations

Interpretation ID: aiam0745

Mr. Stan Haransky, Associate Director, Truck Body and Equipment Association, Inc., 5530 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1120, Washington, DC 20015; Mr. Stan Haransky
Associate Director
Truck Body and Equipment Association
Inc.
5530 Wisconsin Avenue
Suite 1120
Washington
DC 20015;

Dear Mr. Haransky: This is in reply to your letter of May 30, 1972, forwarding to u correspondence you received from Mr. Calvin D. Kunkle of FMC Corporation. Mr. Kunkle's question, as explained in a telephone conversation we had with him on June 16, 1972, is whether building vehicles whose actual loaded weight exceeds the gross vehicle weight rating of the chassis violates Federal law. Mr. Kunkle stated that he believed certain manufacturers of fire-fighting vehicles were presently doing that.; If the loaded weight is clearly inconsistent with the definitions o GVWR and GAWR as specified in 49 CFR 571.3, the manufacturer will be in violation of the Certification regulations, (49 CFR Part 567) and may be subject to civil penalties. Also, if the loaded weight of the completed vehicle or the weight imposed on any of its axle systems exceeds the stated ratings, the vehicle might be found by NHTSA to contain a safety-related defect. In such a case, the manufacturer is required to mail notification of the defect to all the purchasers. In addressing whether such a safety defect exists, the NHTSA considers the situation as a whole, including such factors as the manufacturer's ratings, and the true capacity of the vehicle.; We advised Mr. Kunkle during our conversation that if he will furnis to NHTSA the names of companies he suspects are involved in this practice, we will take action to bring them into conformity with the requirements.; Yours truly, Richard B. Dyson, Assistant Chief Counsel