Interpretation ID: aiam2333
P.O. Box 937
Fort Valley GA 31030;
Dear Mr. Milby This responds to Blue Bird Body Company's May 29, 1976, questio whether safety chains are prohibited across the opening of a side or rear emergency door that is provided in satisfaction of S5.2.3.1 of Standard No. 217, *Bus Window Retention and Release*. You note that the State of Washington plans to require a seat guard' at side emergency doors to prevent students from accidentally falling through these openings.; The requirements of Standard No. 217 for school buses manufactured o or after October 26, 1976, specify that each school bus shall be equipped with either a rear emergency door or a side emergency door and a rear window (S5.2.3.1). Unobstructed passage through these exits from the interior of the bus is required by S5.4. A parallelepiped of specified dimensions must be capable of unobstructed passage through rear doors, and the rearmost point of a seat back must coincide with the forward edge of a side emergency door, so that unobstructed passage from the vehicle interior is preserved.; The agency's intent in specifying these emergency exit provisions is t assure unimpeded egress from school buses in the event of accident. Small children are often transported in school buses, and provisions for emergency exits should be as simple as possible to assist their exit. For these reasons, sections S5.2.3.1 and S5.4 prohibit the installation of safety chains across any emergency exit provided in satisfaction of S5.2.3.1.; Section 103(d) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Ac provides:; S103 * * * * * >>>(d) Whenever a Federal motor vehicle safety standard under thi subchapter is in effect, no State or political subdivision of a State shall have any authority either to establish, or to continue in effect, with respect to any motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment any safety standard applicable to the same aspect of performance of such vehicle or item of equipment which is not identical to the Federal standard. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the Federal Government or the government of any State or political subdivision thereof from establishing a safety requirement applicable to motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment procured for its own use if such requirement imposes a higher standard of performance than that required to comply with the otherwise applicable Federal standard.<<<; It is the opinion of this agency that the State of Washington' requirement would be preempted as of the effective date of the new school bus requirements of Standard No. 217, with regard to emergency doors that are installed in compliance with S5.2.3.1. The agency does not believe that the requirement for safety chains constitutes a higher level of protection, and has concluded that it would cause the vehicle to be in non-compliance with the requirements of S5.2.3.1 and S5.4.; Sincerely, Frank A. Berndt, Acting Chief Counsel