Skip to main content
Search Interpretations

Interpretation ID: aiam4660

Mr. S. Watanabe, Manager Automotive Lighting Engineering Control Dept. Stanley Electric Co., Ltd. 2-9-l3, Nakameguro, Meguro-Ku Tokyo l53, Japan; Mr. S. Watanabe
Manager Automotive Lighting Engineering Control Dept. Stanley Electric Co.
Ltd. 2-9-l3
Nakameguro
Meguro-Ku Tokyo l53
Japan;

"Dear Mr. Watanabe: This is in reply to your FAX of September 14, l989 asking for an interpretation of Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. l08, with respect to a vehicle headlamp aiming device (VHAD), as shown in the drawing attached to your letter. You have two questions: '1) Does a VHAD without a function which compensates the deviation of floor slope satisfy FMVSS No. l08 S7.7.5.2(a)(l(v)?' Paragraph S7.7.5.2(a)(v) states that 'Means shall be provided in the VHAD for compensating for deviations in floor slope not less than 1.2 degrees from the horizontal that would affect the correct positioning of the headlamp for vertical aim.' If a VHAD is 'without a function which compensates the deviation of floor slope' it would not satisfy Standard No. l08. '2) This Head Lamp is designed to be aimed vertically by means of observing only one spirit level placed on the movable reflector, as shown in the drawing. Does this structure of VHAD satisfy FMVSS No. l08 S7.7.5.2(a)(l)(v)?' The answer is yes, if observation of the simple spirit level is coordinated with an off-vehicle measurement of floor slope. As located, the spirit level with the range of +/- 1.2 degree range will allow aim of the headlamp, even though the vehicle may not be level, and willcompensate for floor slopes of up to 1.2 degrees, thus fulfilling the requirement that there be compensatory means when the vehicle upon which the headlamp is mounted is not resting upon level ground. I hope that this answers your questions. Sincerely, Stephen P. Wood Acting Chief Counsel";