Skip to main content
Search Interpretations

Interpretation ID: nht89-1.15

TYPE: INTERPRETATION-NHTSA

DATE: 02/04/89

FROM: LEON E. PANETTA -- CONGRESS

TO: ERIKA JONES -- CHIEF COUNSEL NATL. HWY. TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMIN.

TITLE: NONE

ATTACHMT: ATTACHED TO LETTER DATED 04/17/89 FROM ERIKA Z. JONES -- NHTSA TO LEON E. PANETTA, REDBOOK A33(2), STANDARD 111

TEXT: Dear Ms. Jones:

Recently one of my constituents contacted me about a matter which falls under your agency's jurisdiction. Specifically, Mr. Botelho, a professional driver, was concerned about the requirements for having a mirror on the right side of his vehicle. He wa nts to know whether there is a law requiring mirrors on the right side and if those mirrors must be made convex.

Mr. Botelho feels that it is important for mirrors to portray an accurate image and not cause an object to appear further away than they really are. In my constituent's opinion, the mirrors are hazardous and confusing.

I would appreciate your office clarifying this requirement and its applications to professional drivers in California. I would like further information on the background of this requirement and the reasons for its implementation.

I would appreciate your agency responding in writing to me directly.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Sincerely,