Interpretation ID: aiam4108
Director
Vehicle Inspection Services
Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles
100 Nashua Street
Boston
MA 02114;
Dear Mr. Kopanon: This responds to your March 19, 1986 letter to our office concernin Federal preemption of state motor vehicle safety standards for school buses. Previously, you had requested us to clarify the language of section 103(d) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act. We responded by letter dated March 24, 1986, which explained the phrase 'procured for the State's own use.' Your current letter focuses specifically on requirements for school bus mirrors in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 111, *Rearview Mirrors*, and asks whether Massachusetts could require an additional mirror on school buses owned by the state and its political subdivisions to enhance the view of school bus operator (sic).; The answer to your question is yes. As explained in our March 2 letter, under S103(d) of the Safety Act, a state may establish safety requirements for motor vehicles procured for its own use if such requirements impose the same or higher standard of performance than the Federal standard. The phrase 'higher standard of performance' means that the state standard must not conflict with the Federal standard, but may contain additional or more stringent requirements. Massachusetts may thus require an additional mirror on its school buses that provides greater views of areas in front of and along sides of the bus. This requirement, however, must not conflict with Federal requirements and prevent the school buses from complying with Federal safety standards.; We explained in our March 24 letter that states may not prescrib safety standards for privately-owned school buses transporting children to private and parochial schools that are not identical to the Federal safety standards covering the same aspects of performance. Your current letter asked further about Massachusetts' requirement that school committees (which we understand to be political subdivisions of the state) provide equal pupil transportation to public, private and parochial schools. You asked whether buses procured to fulfill this mandate are 'procured for the state's own use,' even though the buses would be used to transport students to private and parochial schools.; In our opinion, the answer is yes. NHTSA has interpreted the phras 'procured for its own use' to apply to any vehicle intended for transporting the public which is procured by a state or political subdivision thereof. Buses procured by the state to transport students to private and parochial schools are thus 'procured for the state's own use,' and may be required by Massachusetts to have additional mirrors to promote the safety of the school children they carry. We note, of course, that we suggest no position as to the constitutionality of state law.; I hope we have responded to your concerns. Please contact my office i you have further questions.; Sincerely, Erika Z. Jones, Chief Counsel