Pasar al contenido principal

Los sitios web oficiales usan .gov
Un sitio web .gov pertenece a una organización oficial del Gobierno de Estados Unidos.

Los sitios web seguros .gov usan HTTPS
Un candado ( ) o https:// significa que usted se conectó de forma segura a un sitio web .gov. Comparta información sensible sólo en sitios web oficiales y seguros.

NHTSA Interpretation File Search

Overview

NHTSA's Chief Counsel interprets the statutes that the agency administers and the standards and regulations that it issues. Members of the public may submit requests for interpretation, and the Chief Counsel will respond with a letter of interpretation. These interpretation letters look at the particular facts presented in the question and explain the agency’s opinion on how the law applies given those facts. These letters of interpretation are guidance documents. They do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. They are intended only to provide information to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. 

Understanding NHTSA’s Online Interpretation Files

NHTSA makes its letters of interpretation available to the public on this webpage. 

An interpretation letter represents the opinion of the Chief Counsel based on the facts of individual cases at the time the letter was written. While these letters may be helpful in determining how the agency might answer a question that another person has if that question is similar to a previously considered question, do not assume that a prior interpretation will necessarily apply to your situation.

  • Your facts may be sufficiently different from those presented in prior interpretations, such that the agency's answer to you might be different from the answer in the prior interpretation letter;
  • Your situation may be completely new to the agency and not addressed in an existing interpretation letter;
  • The agency's safety standards or regulations may have changed since the prior interpretation letter was written so that the agency's prior interpretation no longer applies; or
  • Some combination of the above, or other, factors.

Searching NHTSA’s Online Interpretation Files

Before beginning a search, it’s important to understand how this online search works. Below we provide some examples of searches you can run. In some cases, the search results may include words similar to what you searched because it utilizes a fuzzy search algorithm.

Single word search

 Example: car
 Result: Any document containing that word.

Multiple word search

 Example: car seat requirements
 Result: Any document containing any of these words.

Connector word search

 Example: car AND seat AND requirements
 Result: Any document containing all of these words.

 Note: Search operators such as AND or OR must be in all capital letters.

Phrase in double quotes

 Example: "headlamp function"
 Result: Any document with that phrase.

Conjunctive search

Example: functionally AND minima
Result: Any document with both of those words.

Wildcard

Example: headl*
Result: Any document with a word beginning with those letters (e.g., headlamp, headlight, headlamps).

Example: no*compl*
Result: Any document beginning with the letters “no” followed by the letters “compl” (e.g., noncompliance, non-complying).

Not

Example: headlamp NOT crash
Result: Any document containing the word “headlamp” and not the word “crash.”

Complex searches

You can combine search operators to write more targeted searches.

Note: The database does not currently support phrase searches with wildcards (e.g., “make* inoperative”). 

Example: Headl* AND (supplement* OR auxiliary OR impair*)
Result: Any document containing words that are variants of “headlamp” (headlamp, headlights, etc.) and also containing a variant of “supplement” (supplement, supplemental, etc.) or “impair” (impair, impairment, etc.) or the word “auxiliary.”

Search Tool

NHTSA's Interpretation Files Search



Displaying 3701 - 3710 of 16517
Interpretations Date

ID: aiam5354

Open
Mr. Luis Carricaburu South Steering Specialists 18310 S. Dixie Hwy Miami, FL 33157; Mr. Luis Carricaburu South Steering Specialists 18310 S. Dixie Hwy Miami
FL 33157;

"Dear Mr. Carricaburu: This responds to your letter asking whether i is legal to buy or sell a salvaged air bag which would be used to repair an automobile with a deployed air bag. Your letter explained that the salvaged air bag would be taken from an automobile sent to a recycling yard with its air bag intact. I am enclosing two letters that explain legal obligations to replace air bags which have been deployed. The first letter, dated January, 19, 1990, is to Ms. Linda L. Conrad. The second letter, dated March 4, 1993, is to Mr. Robert A. Ernst. As explained in those letters, Federal law does not require replacement of a deployed air bag in a used vehicle. In addition, there is no Federal law that prohibits selling a used vehicle with an air bag that is inoperable because of a previous deployment. However, our agency strongly encourages dealers and repair businesses to replace deployed air bags whenever vehicles are repaired or resold, to ensure that the vehicles will continue to provide maximum crash protection for occupants. Moreover, a dealer or repair business may be required by state law to replace a deployed air bag, or be liable for failure to do so. Your letter asks the additional question of whether, if a deployed air bag is replaced, Federal law prohibits use of a salvaged air bag as the replacement air bag. The answer to your question is no. As explained in the enclosed letters, the Safety Act does not require a manufacturer, distributor, dealer, or repair business to return a vehicle to compliance with a standard if a device or element of design has been 'rendered inoperative' by another agent, such as a crash. Thus, Federal law does not regulate the manner in which a deployed air bag is replaced. However, state law may regulate the manner in which a deployed air bag is replaced. I would like to emphasize that in order for a replacement air bag to provide protection to vehicle occupants, it is essential that the replacement be properly completed. For example, the entire air bag must be replaced, including such things as the crash sensors, the inflation mechanism, and other electronic parts. Moreover, since air bags are designed for specific vehicles, taking into consideration such factors as the seats, steering column crush stroke force resistance, gauge array and location on instrument panel, location and nature of knee bolsters, and compartment acceleration responses in frontal crashes, only air bags which are designed for the vehicle in question should be used. After the air bags are replaced, it is important that the air bag readiness indicator be in good working order to alert the occupants of any future malfunction of the air bag system. While great care must be taken in any air bag replacement, the use of a salvaged air bag raises additional safety issues. An air bag may have been rendered inoperable, for example, by damage in a low-speed crash, even if it has not been deployed. We would urge you to contact the vehicle or air bag manufacturer to determine whether and how a salvaged air bag could be inspected and/or tested to ensure that it is fully operable. Finally, you may wish to consult a private attorney concerning the state law implications of using salvaged air bags for repairing automobiles, including possible tort liability. I hope you find this information helpful. If you have any other questions, please contact Mary Versailles of my staff at this address or by phone at (202) 366-2992. Sincerely, John Womack Acting Chief Counsel Enclosures";

ID: aiam1317

Open
Greg Beck, 1715 Swarr Run Rd., Lancaster, PA 17601; Greg Beck
1715 Swarr Run Rd.
Lancaster
PA 17601;

Dear Mr. Beck: Your letter of October 18, 1973, asks what violations of the Federa odometer laws may have occurred in your purchase of a 1962 Tempest which was misrepresented as a 1964 model.; Misrepresentation of the model year, which appears to be your principa grievance, is not a violation of Federal law but could be a violation of local laws against fraudulent merchandising.; Bill Tillett's failure to give you a disclosure statement may be violation of the Federal odometer disclosure regulation, a copy of which is enclosed. After March 1, 1973, the regulation requires each seller to make a signed, written disclosure of a vehicle's recorded mileage to his purchaser. If he knows the odometer reading is inaccurate, he must also state that the actual mileage is unknown. This statement must be made before the vehicle is sold.; If your seller violated these regulations with fraudulent intent, civil remedy is available to you under S 409 of the Act for $1,500 or treble damages, whichever is greater. To obtain your remedy, S 409 provides that you may bring a private civil action in State or Federal court. You may wish to consult an attorney about the possibility of bringing an action in your case.; Sincerely, Lawrence R. Schneider, Chief Counsel

ID: aiam4115

Open
Mr. Robert P. Horbatt, President, Semperit Tire Company, 156 Ludlow Avenue, Northvale, NJ 07647; Mr. Robert P. Horbatt
President
Semperit Tire Company
156 Ludlow Avenue
Northvale
NJ 07647;

Dear Mr. Horbatt: This responds to your letter to Stephen Kratzke of my staff, in whic you stated your interpretation of the requirements of the Uniform Tire Quality Grading Standards (49 CFR S575.104, 'UTQGS'). You stated that your company is introducing a new all-season tire to the United States market, and that you would like to import the first six months' production without the UTQGS grades molded onto the sidewall of the tires, but with paper labels showing those grades. This course of action is expressly permitted by the UTQGS.; First, the UTQGS is applicable to all-season tires. Sectio 575.104(c)(1) specifies that the UTQGS does not apply to 'winter-type snow tires.' The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has explained that winter-type snow tires refers only to tires with a deep tread rubber and tread design which are inadvisable for year-round use on passenger automobiles. Since all-season tires are not 'winter-type snow tires,' they are subject to the requirements of the UTQGS. *See* 44 FR 30139, at 30140, May 24, 1979.; The requirement that the grades assigned under the UTQGS be permanentl molded onto one sidewall of each passenger car tire is set forth in 49 CFR S575.104(d)(1)(i)(A). However, that section reads: *'Except for a tire of a new tire line, manufactured within the first six months of production of the tire line*, each tire shall be graded with the words, letters, symbols, and figures ... permanently molded into or onto the tire sidewall....' A tire line introduced for the first time into the United States is considered a new tire line for the purposes of this section. Therefore, our UTQGS regulation does *not* require you to mold the assigned grades onto a sidewall of those tires manufactured within the first six months of production. Such tires are subject to the requirement that a paper label, showing the UTQGS grades assigned to the tire, be affixed to its tread surface (49 CFR S575.104(d)(1)(i)(B)), and that the grades assigned to those tires appear in the information furnished to prospective purchasers of the tires (49 CFR S575.6(c)).; If you have any further questions or need more information on thi subject, please contact Mr. Kratzke at this address or by telephone at (202) 426-2992.; Sincerely, Erika Z. Jones, Chief Counsel

ID: aiam2868

Open
Mr. James Tydings, Specifications Engineer, Thomas Built Buses, Inc., P.O. Box 2450, High Point, NC 27261; Mr. James Tydings
Specifications Engineer
Thomas Built Buses
Inc.
P.O. Box 2450
High Point
NC 27261;

Dear Mr. Tydings: This responds to your August 25, 1978, letter asking what the ter 'normal nighttime illumination' means in Standard No. 217, *Bus Window Retention and Release*.; The term 'normal nighttime illumination' is found in paragraph S5.5. of the standard. This section requires that all interior exit instructions be legible when the only source of light is the normal nighttime illumination of the vehicle. The term, as used in this paragraph, means that exit instructions must be visible with the normal interior vehicle lighting that is in use when the bus is moving. Interior vehicle lighting may include, for example, reading lamps and overhead lights.; Sincerely, Joseph J. Levin, Jr., Chief Counsel

ID: aiam0855

Open
Mr. E. M. Anderson, Vice President, Ingram Manufacturing Co., P.O. Box 2020, San Antonio, TX 78297; Mr. E. M. Anderson
Vice President
Ingram Manufacturing Co.
P.O. Box 2020
San Antonio
TX 78297;

Dear Mr. Anderson: I apologize for the delay in answering your letter regarding Part 566 Manufacturer Identification. You describe the vehicles you manufacture and ask whether you are a manufacturer within the meaning of the regulation and therefore required to submit information regarding your products.; Part 566 applies to manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor vehicl equipment to which a motor vehicle safety standard applies. 'Motor vehicle' is defined in the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act as 'any vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power manufactured primarily for use on the public streets, roads, and highway'. Since the portable tandem rollers you describe appear to be manufactured for construction or farm use you are not considered a manufacturer of motor vehicles and are not covered by Part 566. Therefore you are not required to submit information under that regulation. For similar reasons you are not covered by the certification requirements of Part 567 and 568 which you also mentioned.; Sincerely, Richard B. Dyson, Assistant Chief Counsel

ID: aiam1747

Open
Mr. Ralph Millet, Saab-Scania of America, Inc., P. O. Box 697, Orange, CT 06477; Mr. Ralph Millet
Saab-Scania of America
Inc.
P. O. Box 697
Orange
CT 06477;

Dear Mr. Millet: This is to confirm the opinion which I gave to you at our January 8 1975, meeting that Saab's defect notification campaign involving 99E, LE, and EMS models with leakage problems in the fuel injection system is subject to the recent amendments to the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Pub. L. 93-492, 88 Stat. 1470), which became effective December 26, 1974. These amendments require Saab to remedy the defect without charge and do not permit Saab's limiting the remedy without charge to vehicles brought in for repair before July 1, 1975. A revised letter must indicate in accordance with Section 153 of the amendments that Saab will remedy the vehicles without charge. Section 153 also requires certain information not presently required to be included in all notification letters. Section 153(a)(5) requires the notification to state the earliest date on which the defect will be remedied and section 153(a)(6) requires the inclusion of a 'description of the procedure to be followed by the recipient of the notification in informing the Secretary' if Saab fails or is unable to remedy without charge.; We do not believe the notification letter which you mailed on Decembe 26, 1974, conforms to these requirements. With respect to the date of remedy, you state that the parts are 'now available' to dealers. Because remedy without charge is contingent upon actual dates, we believe the inclusion of a specific date is required. Moreover, that date should reflect the fact that dealers have actually received parts, rather than that parts are merely available to them. The reference to availability is ambiguous, in our view, for it does not reveal whether manufacturers in fact are prepared at that time to make necessary repairs. You must also include information that is responsive to section 153(a)(6). As the procedures referred to have not been published, it is sufficient if you advise owners that they can write the Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C. 20590, if they find Saab to have failed or to have been unable to perform the repair satisfactorily.; In other respects, we believe your letter does meet the requirements o section 153. Revised letters should be sent to all owners who have not had their vehicles repaired at the time of mailing, and should be mailed as expeditiously as possible after Saab receives the names of registered owners it has ordered.; Yours truly, Richard B. Dyson, Acting Chief Counsel

ID: aiam4545

Open
Mr. M. Iwase, Manager Technical Administrative Department Koito Mfg. Co., Ltd. Shizuoka Works 500, Kitawaki Shimizu-shi, Shizuoka-Ken Japan; Mr. M. Iwase
Manager Technical Administrative Department Koito Mfg. Co.
Ltd. Shizuoka Works 500
Kitawaki Shimizu-shi
Shizuoka-Ken Japan;

Dear Mr. Iwase: This is in reply to your letter of February 22, 1988 asking whether location of a stop and taillamp on a deck lid would comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108. In your opinion this is acceptable because the vehicle complies with the trunk lid closed. You have also asked, alternatively, whether the deck lid is an acceptable location for turn signal lamps. Section S4.3.1 of Standard No. 108 requires lighting devices to be mounted on 'a rigid part of the vehicle...that is not designed to be removed except for repair'. In past interpretations the agency has stated that a deck lid is 'a rigid part of the vehicle', and that compliance with the standard will be determined with the deck lid closed. Thus, it may be used for mounting lamps and reflectors required by Standard No. 108. However, Table IV specifies the location for rear lamps. Stoplamps, taillamps, rear turn signal lamps, and rear reflex reflectors must be mounted 'as far apart as practicable'. Although the determination of practicability is initially made by the vehicle manufacturer, the agency in its enforcement efforts would consider whether lighting equipment mounted on the deck lid meets the requirements of Table IV. On the other hand, the separation requirement is not specified for backup lamps and license plate lamps. I have enclosed for your information a copy of a l980 interpretation that addressed a similar question. As you will note, the agency raised some safety concerns in that letter which could also pertain to your design. Operation of a motor vehicle in the United States is subject to the laws of the individual States, some of which may prohibit operation of a vehicle when its turn signals and stop lamps are not visible. In summary, we urge you to consider the issues described above, including those raised in the l980 letter, in deciding whether to proceed with this design. Sincerely, Erika Z. Jones Chief Counsel Enclosure;

ID: aiam3280

Open
Mr. Hisakazu Murakami, Technical Representative, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., P.O. Box 57105, Washington, DC 20037; Mr. Hisakazu Murakami
Technical Representative
Nissan Motor Co.
Ltd.
P.O. Box 57105
Washington
DC 20037;

Dear Mr. Murakami: This responds to your recent letter requesting an interpretatio concerning folding jump seats you intend to install in some future van models that your company manufactures. You ask whether the seats would qualify as 'designated seating positions', for purposes of the Federal motor vehicle safety standards. The term 'designated seating position' is defined in 49 CFR Part 571.3 as:; >>>any plan view location capable of accommodating a person at least a large as a 5th percentile adult female, if the overall seat configuration and design is such that the position is likely to be used as a seating position while the vehicle is in motion, *except for auxiliary seating accommodations such as temporary or folding jump seats* . . . . (emphasis added).; <<

ID: aiam2887

Open
Mr. R. W. Cheetham, Director, Quality Assurance, The Armstrong Rubber Company, 500 Sargent Drive, New Haven, CT 06507; Mr. R. W. Cheetham
Director
Quality Assurance
The Armstrong Rubber Company
500 Sargent Drive
New Haven
CT 06507;

Dear Mr. Cheetham: This is in response to your letter of October 19, 1978, requestin approval of the tread labels Armstrong Rubber Company proposes to use in satisfaction of the labeling requirements of the Uniform Tire Quality Grading Standards (UTQGS)(49 CFR 575.104(d)(1)(i)(B)). You propose to include the applicable UTQGS grades for a particular tire on a tread label identifying the tire brand, type and size. A separate label would contain the general grading information from Figure 2 of the rule, including a listing of all possible traction and temperature grades, with the text on the label oriented along the tread circumference instead of across it.; Part 575.104(d)(1)(i)(B) requires that each passenger car replacemen tire, other than a snow tire or temporary use spare tire, have affixed a tread label containing both the specific UTQGS grades for the tire and an explanation of the grades in the form illustrated in Figure 2. Thus, the specific grades for the tire must appear on the same label that contains the explanation of the grading system. The regulation calls for a depiction of all possible traction and temperature grades with the grades applicable to the specific tire indelibly circled.; While the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has n objection to the inclusion of the required UTQGS information on the same label with other data such as tire size and brand name, failure to provide the required explanations on the same label with the applicable tire grades is not permitted by the regulation. Your proposed labels also fail to meet the regulation's requirement that applicable traction and temperature grades be denoted by circling the appropriate letter in a display of all possible grades. Finally, the general UTQGS information in your proposal is not in the form illustrated in Figure 2, since the text in your example will appear along the tread rather than at right angles as specified by Figure 2.; While your proposed tread labels do not meet the present requirement of Part 575.104(d)(1)(i)(B), NHTSA will treat your letter as a petition for rulemaking and consider amending the UTQG regulation to permit greater flexibility in tread labeling.; Sincerely, Joseph J. Levin, Jr., Chief Counsel

ID: aiam3795

Open
Mr. Frank Pepe, Assistant Vice President, Engineering Services Division, United States Testing Company, Inc., 1415 Park Avenue, Hoboken, NJ 07030; Mr. Frank Pepe
Assistant Vice President
Engineering Services Division
United States Testing Company
Inc.
1415 Park Avenue
Hoboken
NJ 07030;

Dear Mr. Pepe: This responds to your letter concerning Safety Standard No. 209, *Sea Belt Assemblies*. You asked several questions about the requirements applicable to a Type 2 Vehicle Sensitive Emergency Locking Retractor utilizing a tension reducer device. The particular device you are concerned about is, according to your letter, activated by the vehicle door. With the door open the mechanism operates in a high tension mode, with the door closed the mechanism is in a low tension mode.; By way of background information, this agency does not grant approval of vehicles or motor vehicle equipment. Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to certify that its vehicles or equipment comply with applicable requirements. The following represents our opinion based on the facts provided in your letter.; Safety Standard No. 209 specifies requirements concerning minimum an maximum retraction force. Requirements are specified for both initial retraction force and retraction force after a test sequence which includes lengthy retractor cycling. See sections S4.3(j), (k) and S5.2(k).; As you know, retractors have traditionally had only one rather than tw tension modes. Standard No. 209 does not prohibit a design with two tension modes. However, as written, the standard's requirements do not distinguish between tension modes.; We agree with your suggestion that both tension modes should be teste for retraction force effort as specified in the standard. However, we do not agree with your suggestion that the high tension mode should only be tested for minimum retraction force and the low tension mode for maximum retraction force. Instead, because Standard No. 209 does not distinguish between tension modes, we interpret the standard to require that all of its requirements must be met in both tension modes. For example, under section S4.3(j)(6), both tension modes must exert a retractive force within the 0.2 to 1.5 pound range. For testing purposes, of course, a single retractor could only be fully tested for one of the two modes, since testing for both modes would involve twice the amount of cycling required by the standard.; Your letter states that since the high tension mode is used only fo stowing the webbing and is not in operation during normal use, you believe that only cycling tests without lock-ups should be performed in testing. While we appreciate this argument, the standard, as written, does not permit that exception. Section S5.2(k) states in relevant part:; >>>...An emergency-locking retractor or a nonlocking retractor attache to upper torso restraint shall be subjected to 45,000 additional cycles of webbing withdrawal and retraction between 50 and 100 percent extension. The locking mechanism of an emergency locking retractor shall be actuated at least 10,000 times within 50 to 100 percent extension of webbing during the 50,000 cycles....<<<; Since the standard does not distinguish between tension modes, lock-up should be performed in testing for both the low and high tension modes.; As already noted, the retractor in question represents a new desig which was not specifically considered in drafting Standard No. 209. If the standard as written creates problems, the manufacturer may wish to consider submitting a petition for rulemaking to amend the standard to establish special test procedures.; Your letter suggests that there may be a conflict between sectio S7.4.2 of Standard No. 208, *Occupant Crash Protection*, and Standard No. 209's 0.2 pound retraction force requirement (section S4.3(j)). However, section S7.4.2 of Standard No. 208 only applies to automatic belt systems, while section S5.3(j) of Standard No. 209 only applies to active belt systems. Therefore, there can be no conflict.; Sincerely, Frank Berndt, Chief Counsel

Request an Interpretation

You may email your request to Interpretations.NHTSA@dot.gov or send your request in hard copy to:

The Chief Counsel
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, W41-326
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20590

If you want to talk to someone at NHTSA about what a request for interpretation should include, call the Office of the Chief Counsel at 202-366-2992.

Please note that NHTSA’s response will be made available in this online database, and that the incoming interpretation request may also be made publicly available.

Go to top of page